CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

February 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: penetration depth
From:
Bill Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Feb 2008 21:16:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

ultimately the lower NA with its longer working distance wins if the 
sample is clear enough..


At 08:31 PM 2/4/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>Search the CONFOCAL archive at 
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>Hello all!
>
>I was wondering for which one penetration depth is higher: NA:1.2 
>60x lens or NA : 0.3 10x lens?
>
>thanks
>Sarah

ATOM RSS1 RSS2