CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pedro Camello <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 5 May 2008 12:01:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi all,

I´m planning to find a substitute for our old confocal. Since I´m tired of
maintenance issues with costly short-lived lasers (around 1000 hours Argon
lasers costs 15000 euros in Spain), I was looking for a lamp-based system to
avoid wavelength limitations and costs. Am I wrong or is CARV-II the only
commercial system of these characteristics at the moment? Otherwise, are
recent lasers less expensive and short-lived?.

In addition, could any of you share experiences about commercial TIRF
systems? I would prefer a widefield system incorporating TIRF as an option
(I listened about a ring-shaped filters from Olympus)

Thanks

ATOM RSS1 RSS2