CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: IRDye 800
From:
Kate Phelps <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:45:04 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines) 
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

I neglected to mention that we can take very nice pictures of 
immunofluorescence labeling with IRDye 800 goat anti-rabbit secondary
antibody with this set up. So it is a problem of optimizing to detect a very
weak signal, not whether we can do it at all.
Thanks for everyone's help. Please keep the suggestions coming!

Kate

ATOM RSS1 RSS2