CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

September 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Nowell, Cameron" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2008 12:33:11 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (83 lines)
SAS drives are much faster and being enterprise class hardware will last
longer (on average). Of course there is a couple of tradeoffs. One being
the cost of them, here in Australia a 320GB SATA drive will cost you
about $100 while the equivalent SAS drive is $770. The second thing is
the noise they make. SAS drives are more for the server environment, so
they spin at 15,000 rpm (sounds like a jet taking off when they spin
up). 

SAS doesn't suffer the problems of configuration of SCSI, these issues
are on of the reason for SAS being created.


Cheers


Cam


Cameron J Nowell 
Microscopy Research and Imaging Core Facility
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
12 St Andrews Place
East Mebourne, 3002
Victoria, Australia

Phone: +61396561243
Fax:       +61396561411
Mobil:  +614122882700



-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of Johan Henriksson
Sent: Wednesday, 24 September 2008 6:10 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Advice for offline image analysis computer


Craig Brideau wrote:
> Does anyone use those SAS hard drives in their machines?  I'm just
using
> SATA; I was wondering if SAS was a substantial improvement (i.e. worth
the
> extra cost)?
>   
SATA here. I think the cost is the small problem; maintenance is worse.
I expect the same problem as SCSI has, that is,
interfaces become obsolete way too fast and finding spare parts is hard.
but if you run a server, need the performance and
can afford the work to maintain it, don't hesitate. a SATA RAID array
might give the same performance though, with less trouble,
and other advantages.

-- 
--
------------------------------------------------
Johan Henriksson
MSc Engineering
PhD student, Karolinska Institutet
http://mahogny.areta.org http://www.endrov.net

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.169 / Virus Database: 270.7.0/1684 - Release Date:
22/09/2008 6:39 AM

This email (including any attachments or links) may contain 
confidential and/or legally privileged information and is 
intended only to be read or used by the addressee.  If you 
are not the intended addressee, any use, distribution, 
disclosure or copying of this email is strictly 
prohibited.  
Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this email 
(including any attachments) are not waived or lost by 
reason of its mistaken delivery to you.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it 
and notify us immediately by telephone or email.  Peter 
MacCallum Cancer Centre provides no guarantee that this 
transmission is free of virus or that it has not been 
intercepted or altered and will not be liable for any delay 
in its receipt.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2