I just want one fixed wavelength within that range eventually. The  
problem is that I don't know which one will work the best on my  
sample. I only know it should lay between 380 and 400nm from my other  
experiments. And I'm hoping to find an inexpensive way to find out.

Yue


Quoting Guy Cox <[log in to unmask]>:

> Yes, he was referring to a doubler.  The problem is people are
> still not clear whether you want to tune the wavelength between
> 380 and 400 nm  (in which case Sergey's suggestion is the most
> practical way to go, but is very expensive) or whether you just
> want one fixed wavelength within that range, which is easy and
> cheap to get with a diode.
>
>                                                   Guy
>
>
>
> Optical Imaging Techniques in Cell Biology
> by Guy Cox    CRC Press / Taylor & Francis
>     http://www.guycox.com/optical.htm
> ______________________________________________
> Associate Professor Guy Cox, MA, DPhil(Oxon)
> Electron Microscope Unit, Madsen Building F09,
> University of Sydney, NSW 2006
> ______________________________________________
> Phone +61 2 9351 3176     Fax +61 2 9351 7682
> Mobile 0413 281 861
> ______________________________________________
>      http://www.guycox.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List   
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of   
> [log in to unmask]
> Sent: Friday, 6 March 2009 4:18 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: question about laser
>
> I don't quite understand. The laser beam we are looking for is   
> between 380 and 400nm. Are you thinking of the doubler? Could you   
> please give more detail? Thanks a lot.
>
> Yue
>
>
> Quoting "Femto @Sciner" <[log in to unmask]>:
>
>> Second Harmonic of CW Ti:Sapphire tunable between 760 and 800 nm.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Sergey Egorov
>> Del Mar Photonics
>> 4119 Twilight Ridge
>> San Diego, CA 92130
>> tel (858) 876-3133
>> fax (858) 630-2376
>> http://www.dmphotonics.com/
>>
>>
>> [log in to unmask] wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> We are looking for a coherent (or continuous wave) laser ranging
>>> from 380nm to 400nm. So far we haven't found anything impressive.
>>> Does anyone know any laser between that range? Thanks a lot!
>>>
>>> Yue
>>>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.7/1983 - Release Date:   
> 4/03/2009 7:41 AM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.7/1983 - Release Date:   
> 4/03/2009 7:41 AM
>
>