Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 21 Sep 2009 10:26:14 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Sundar
I am unsure if there is a standard way to compare your "before" and
"after" deconvolution image stacks, but one way that I've seen in the
literature is to analyze identical line profiles in both image sets
(either in the xy lateral dimensions or along the z-direction) and
present the profiles on the same graph. If your deconvolution has
worked, features of interest along your line profiles should be
sharper in the deconvolved line. ImageJ has several standard
functions and plugins that could be used to do this.
John Oreopoulos
On 21-Sep-09, at 10:08 AM, sundar wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I'm using a deconvolution software to deconvolve a 3D stack. Does
> anyone
> know of any way in which I can measure the improvement over the
> original
> dataset? Are there any standard techniques for the same?
>
> Thanks,
> Sundar
> --
> View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Validating-
> deconvolution-tp3685530p3685530.html
> Sent from the Confocal Microscopy List mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
|
|
|