Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 1 Jul 2011 14:54:18 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
Hi Hans,
Basically, same answer as Gabor... We are happy with ours. We have
CoolLEDs both on our confocals (for visual inspection, this is more than
sufficient) and on some of our wide-field live cell imaging setups.
Intensity is lower than a strong metal halide light, but with live cells
you want anyhow to avoid photobleaching and photodamage...
Best regards,
Laurent.
___________________________
Laurent Gelman, PhD
Friedrich Miescher Institut
Facility for Advanced Imaging and Microscopy
WRO 1066.2.16
Maulbeerstrasse 66
CH-4058 Basel
+41 (0)79 618 73 69
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of H. de Bont
Sent: mercredi 29 juin 2011 09:56
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: CoolLED
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
Hello All,
We are buying a new confocal/epi microscope.
And are interested in experience of users with the CoolLED system.
Do you recommend the CoolLED system over a metal halide lamp?
We want to use the system with epi fluorescence of live cells with
Hoechst,
GFP and Cy3 channels.
Thanks,
Hans de Bont
Dept of Toxicology
LACDR
University of Leiden
Einsteinweg 55
2333 CC Leiden
The Netherlands
Tel: 071-5274496
Mobile: 06-11351598
|
|
|