CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2012

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Schell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 5 Jul 2012 14:41:16 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Another issue surrounding Prolong curing is the creation of a refractive
index gradient within the sample.  We usually cure overnight (~18 hr) in a
fume hood and then seal with nail polish.  In retrospect, we may be
over-accelerating the curing because 3D images of imbedded fluorescent
beads sometimes show an asymmetrical PSF, especially in the Z-plane.  This
indicates that we are not getting a uniform increase in RI during curing--
some parts of the sample may have better exchange with air than other
parts.  Slower curing (say, 2-3 days, not in a hood) might reduce this
problem.  Or, using smaller coverslips.  Or, just using less Prolong during
mounting.

Michael J. Schell
Assistant Professor
Uniformed Services University

ATOM RSS1 RSS2