CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

October 2012

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scot C Kuo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:35:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (55 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

I've measured it quantitatively and the performance difference flips surprisingly close to the coverslip (see supplemental info, Fisher & Kuo 2009 PNAS 106, 133-138).  For an Olympus 60x U-PlanApoS lenses, comparing 1.2 and 1.4 NA, the flip happens ~8 microns into an aqueous sample.  For fluorescence closer than ~8um, oil is brighter, whereas for objects further, water immersion is brighter.  If lenses aren't matched, then the cross-over can happen elsewhere, but the relative shapes of the curves are the same.  Oil lenses (1.4NA) will have half the brightness by ~50um.

For the information you've provided (higher NA on water lens), I'd expect the cross-over to be closer to the coverslip surface.

-- Scot

============================================================================
...............Scot C. Kuo (410) 955-4536; email:skuo@jhu.edu...............
...Director, Microscope Facility, JHU-SOM, www.hopkinsmedicine.org/micfac...
..Assoc Professor, Biomedical Engineering & Cell Biology, www.jhu.edu/cmml..


----- Original Message -----
From: Gabriel Lapointe <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thursday, October 4, 2012 9:16 am
Subject: [CONFOCALMICROSCOPY] Oil vs water objectives
To: [log in to unmask]


> *****
>  To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>  
>  *****
>  
>  Hi,
>  
>  I have a user who insist that using a 1,27NA water immersion 
> objective is
>  brighter and would give better images than using a 1,4NA oil 
> immersion. I
>  understand that deeper into the media that would be true. But, in that
>  particular case, we are talking about imaging GFP at less than 100 micron
>  away with a spinning disk.
>  
>  So, I was wondering at which distance from the coverslips do we start
>  seeing benefits of using a water immersion objective over an oil objective
>  in aqueous media.
>  
>  Thanks for your help.
>  
>  Sincerely
>  *Gabriel Lapointe, M.Sc.*
>  Lab Manager / Microscopy Specialist
>  Concordia University, Biology Department
>  7141 Sherbrooke St. West SP 534
>  Montréal QC H4B 1R6 Canada
>  [log in to unmask]
>  cmac.concordia.ca
>   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2