CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

June 2013

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
George McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Fri, 28 Jun 2013 07:27:38 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (109 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

If the PCR is successful, still leaves to do RT-PCR to see if the 
messenger RNA is still there (and the right size). The promoter may not 
work well in your cells.
May be simpler to do immunofluorescence (with red or far-red 
fluorophore), with an EGFP cell line as a positive control.

Several months ago I mentioned in a posting Michael Davidson's five 
favorite photoactivatable/convertible/etc proteins:

Michael Davidson, who told me: "The best photoswitchable proteins are tdEos, mEos4, PS-CFP2, PA-mCherry1, and Dendra2."

http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1304&L=confocalmicroscopy&P=11619 
<http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind1304&L=confocalmicroscopy&P=11619>

Consider using one of those instead. Caveat - Dendra2 is in addgene, but 
only in C elegans or no expression plasmids. You can ask Michael 
Davidson about availability, and possibly a stable cell line from one of 
his publications. mEos4 is from Loren Looger's lab, and is described at
https://www.linkedin.com/pub/maria-gabriela-paez-segala/61/978/b55

    In particular, I have made substantial progress in engineering a
    version of mEos with increased protein stability (mEos2 to mEos4).
    mEos2 was the last fluorescent protein designed by Sean McKinney in
    the Looger lab. It is a photoconvertible fluorescent protein
    (changes fluorescence from green to red by hitting with UV light),
    and basically is the best standard photoconvertible FP (fluorescent
    protein) until date. Our codename for a better mEos2 now is mEos4. I
    first began by working on improving the thermal stability, and
    currently I am specifically working on fixatives and
    auto-fluorescence of some variants of mEos2. With the electron
    microscopy (EM) team, Richard Fetter, Yalin Wang, and Mei Sun, our
    main discovery has been a new protocol for EM that will allow us to
    use CLEM for any fluorophore and fluorescent protein, by decreasing
    the auto-fluorescence of fixatives, the harsh conditions of OsO4,
    and increasing the ultra-structure preservation of cell tissue.

Hopefully mEos4 will be published soon - you could email Loren Looger at 
HHMI Janelia Farm
http://www.hhmi.org/research/groupleaders/looger_bio.html

Or, consider buying rsEGFP2 or Dreiklang from Abberior
http://www.abberior.com/products/productlist/cat/fluorescent-proteins/prod/abberior-rsegfp/


best wishes,

George


On 6/28/2013 5:48 AM, Sarang Kulkarni wrote:
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Screen your stable cell lines by PCR to confirm if the gfp gene is still there.
>
> Sarang Kulkarni
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 2013-06-28, at 3:02 AM, "Aryeh Weiss"<[log in to unmask]>  wrote:
>
>    
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>> *****
>>
>> This is a not-really-confocal question, but I think it is well within the list's expertise.
>>
>> We have been trying to create  a stable line of B16 melanoma cells which will express photoactivatable GFP, and can be lit up whenever we like.
>> So we transfected with what we think is a suitable plasmid
>> (11910 pPAGFP-C1 from Addgene), and sure enough, we have  cells that survive the selection marker (Neo) while the controls die.
>> So we think we have our stable cell line.
>>
>> Problem is -- none of them light up. They dont light up in a widefield scope,  and they dont light up in the confocal, when zapped with 405nm
>> excitation (we tried different exposures, from 100ms to many seconds).
>>
>> So I must be missing something obvious, because this is not a new technology. If someone can point me in the right direction, that would be wonderful.
>>
>> --aryeh
>> -- 
>> Aryeh Weiss
>> Faculty of Engineering
>> Bar Ilan University
>> Ramat Gan 52900 Israel
>>
>> Ph:  972-3-5317638
>> FAX: 972-3-7384051
>>      
>    


-- 



George McNamara, Ph.D.
Single Cells Analyst
L.J.N. Cooper Lab
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, TX 77054

ATOM RSS1 RSS2