*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

For dual monitor setups I have actually implemented one large screen and
one smaller screen. The smaller, cheaper monitor has all the controls and
buttons on it, while the large high-quality screen has mostly just the
image on it. I find users appreciate having the interface and the view on
separate monitors. Keeping the large high-quality one free for the imaging
view lets the users tile out their channels with nothing obscuring the
windows. For my setups that have just a single monitor, you want at least a
27" class monitor with 2560x1400  resolution so you have room for both the
interface and the view. There are 'Ultra HD' displays coming out that have
3800+ pixels, but I worry that the overall quality of the display, such as
color reproduction, has taken a hit for the sake of the higher resolution.

Craig

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Jean-Pierre CLAMME <
[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi,
>
> One monitor of our fluoview 1000 died. The system was equipped with 2 x
> 21.3 inch monitors. I have a hard time finding a 21.3 inch replacement
> monitor to match the screen height that is not stupidly expensive.
>
> I heard new systems come with 1 large screen. I would like to know what
> size screen you have that does a good job.
>
> Thank you
>
> JP
>
>
>
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Jean-Pierre CLAMME, PhD
> Chief Scientist
> Nitto Denko Technical
> 501 Via Del Monte
> Oceanside, CA 92058
> E-mail: [log in to unmask]
> Phone: 1-760-696-9428
>