CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 2015

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Neil Anthony <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Mar 2015 14:38:28 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi all, I hope the science is treating you well.

I was wondering if anybody has heard of a good standard sample for 
comparing photobleaching.  I want to compare how different microscopes 
perform under different conditions and wonder how much the sample plays 
a role in quantifying the photobleaching rate.  I would presumably 
calculate the intensity decay over a time lapse as a metric, but wasn't 
sure if the sample type was a factor as I don't know much about the 
photochemistry.  On that note, can anybody recommend a good reference 
that discusses the subtleties of photobleaching?

Thanks in advance for your time.

Neil

ATOM RSS1 RSS2