Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 30 Jun 2015 14:03:27 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****
Hi Dale
While I agree with Craig and Pascal that with shorter laser pulses you have to be more
careful about dispersion, I do not think that you need the autocorrelator that Pascal
mentioned.
Since a prism compressor can only compensate GVD, it is sufficient to just optimize the
signal you get from a dye solution under 2 photon excitation under your microscope while
tuning the compressor.
I wonder though how the APE device works, is that a nonlinear autocorrelator? It is tough to
analyze a laser pulse just by its autocorrelation, as you do not have the spectral phase
information and many different pulse profiles can have the same autocorrelation. To really
diagnose dispersion, you would need the spectral phase, which to my knowledge only FROG
and SPIDER can give you for ultrafast pulses (commercially available, at least).
Best,
Reto
|
|
|