CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 1993

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Cammer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 19 Jul 1993 17:11:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
> purpose. It seems to be that it would be really worth while to here
> from users of various scopes as to what they consider the "pros and cons"
> of the system they use and how it compares in ways favorable or not
> favorable with other systems with which they have experience.
 
I would like to second this request.
 
A specific question we have is which confocal has the best Z axis
resolution.  Using VoxelView we have been reconstructing volumes from
serial sections collected with a 60X objective at approximately a 2X
zoom with a BioRad MRC-600.  So, for instance, would the new Nikon or Noran
microscope provide images with high enough resolution to do this
reconstruction?
 
-Michael  [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2