CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 1994

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Anthony G Moss <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 8 Apr 1994 19:57:12 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Good point on the new vs old Olympus.  I assumed you were talking about
the 160 mm tube length lenses.
Tony Moss
 
 
On Fri, 8 Apr 1994, Andrea Elberger wrote:
 
> Regarding the question of Nikon 60x PlanApo versus the Olympus 60x Planapo,
> which Olympus are you talking about?  Do you mean the older fixed-tube length
> Olympus such as on the BH2 series, or the new infinity-corrected objective on
> the new Olympus BX-50 (BMAX) series?  As far as I know, I am the only person to
> have a CLSM on the new BX-50.  I have limited experience on the Nikon, and the
> new BX-50 60x PlanApo is superior.  ANDREA ELBERGER
> [log in to unmask]
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2