CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

February 1996

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 Feb 1996 12:55:05 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
>Dear Guy Cox (and to others who have measured this):
>   what is your FWHM in the x, y, and particularly z-dimension using
>100 nm beads and the mentioned objective (63x, 1.4 N.A.). I recently
>measured this on our Zeiss LSM410 and was disappointed: 1.8 um FWHM
>with a Zeiss Plan-Neofluar (40X N.A. 1.3 oil) in the z-axis. In the y
>x dimension the FWHM was as expected diffraction limited.
 
 
I'd be pretty disappointed by this figure too.  Measurements I
got, with the abovementioned x63 NA 1.4 lens, on a Bio-Rad MRC600,
were lateral FWHM 250nm, axial 600nm.  I thought these were a little
disappointing, actually. I wonder if you have a refractive index
mismatch problem?
 
                                                Guy Cox

ATOM RSS1 RSS2