CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

June 1996

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Badri Roysam <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 5 Jun 1996 09:59:11 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
----- Begin Included Message -----
 
From [log in to unmask] Tue Jun  4 18:21:52 1996
Reply-To: "Martin W. Wessendorf" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: confocal vs. deconvolution microscopy
Content-Length: 699
X-Lines: 18
 
In message <[log in to unmask]> Badri Roysam writes:
> Just to add some useful material to this exciting discussion, AutoQuant's
> package handles all three - brightfield, widefield fluorescence, and
> confocal.
> Currently, AutoQuant has a free trial offer wherein you can get to try
> their software for free for a month. This may be a good way to check
> out deconvolution for yourself!! For more info, contact [log in to unmask]
 
Dear Dr. Roysam--
 
Thanks for your note.  From the context it sounds as if you wanted to send it to
the confocal group.  However, from the header, the message appears to have been
sent only to me.  Thought you might want to know!
 
Best wishes--
 
Martin
 
 
 
----- End Included Message -----

ATOM RSS1 RSS2