CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

August 1997

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dr M Cannell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Aug 1997 17:48:03 PDT
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (27 lines)
I'm confused, why would an '...intensity of 50 be 2,5, (or even 20
fold less) (in terms of amount of antigen) than an intensity of
150...'? 50 is 3 fold less than 150 (assuming no background). The
other problem is that any bleaching will make such comparisons
impossible. Other than that the A/D converter should be completely
linear within it's 8 bit range..

Regards Mark Cannell



On Mon, 18 Aug 1997 13:57:50 -0400 Wayne Arnold wrote:

> From: Wayne Arnold <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 18 Aug 1997 13:57:50 -0400
> Subject: intensity vs amount of protein
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> I am using a Biorad MRC 600.  Is there a way to correlate
> differen't intensities with amount of antigen present in an
> image. ie I don't want to quantify the antigen, I just need
> to know at a given setting for the photomultiplier can I
> determine if say an intensity of 50 is 2,5, or 20 fold less
> (in terms of amount of antigen) than an intensity of 150.
>
> Wayne

ATOM RSS1 RSS2