Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 3 Nov 2009 11:29:47 -0600 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=UTF-8 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
For those who have not received or even asked for a Google wave invite
(like me!) here is where you can make a request directly to Google:
https://services.google.com/fb/forms/wavesignup/
On Nov 3 2009, manda lo wrote:
>playing around.
>
>i'm [log in to unmask]
>
>manda
>
>Patrick Haggerty wrote:
>> Hey John,
>>
>> Interested in being Google Wave buddies? I just sent my Wave address to
>> the Dev Group, but I'll give you it here:
>>
>>
>> [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Pat
>>
>> ---------------------------------------
>> Patrick Haggerty
>>
>> Office of Information Technology
>> University of Minnesota
>>
>> Email: [log in to unmask]
>> Phone: 612-626-5807
>>
>>
>> On 11/3/09 10:47 AM, John Brian Becker wrote:
>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>> I just received my Google Wave invite a few days ago. If there are any
>>> in progress University of Minnesota Google Waves, I would like to be
>>> added to those waves.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> JB
>>>
>>> John Brian Becker
>>> 220 Cooke Hall
>>> School of Kinesiology
>>> 612.625.1007
>>>
>>> David Naughton wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> How about if those of us on Wave share our addresses? I'm
>>>> [log in to unmask]
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:36:28AM -0500, Tony Thomas wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure how many of us at the U have preview access to Google
>>>>> Wave yet, but it might be interesting to try to set up a Wave for
>>>>> the
>>>>> Web Dev meetings as a way to discuss the meeting topics and follow
>>>>> up
>>>>> with resources, links & etc. from the presenters. There may not be
>>>>> time to get it going today, but perhaps at a future meeting.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've had the opportunity to use Wave for real-time collaboration
>>>>> recently. It's handy, even if still a little buggy.
>>>>>
>>>>> My thought was one Wave per meeting. The Twin Cities Wave has been
>>>>> fun, but has grown into monster. There's something to be said for
>>>>> limiting the subject matter IMO.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
|
|
|