Representing Agrippina: Constructions of Female Power in the Early Roman
Empire. By JUDITH GINSBURG. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press,
2005. Pp. 160. Cloth, $45.00. ISBN 0–19–518141–7.
Order this text for $41.85 from Amazon.com using this link and benefit
CAMWS and the Classical Journal:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/classjourn-20
Print Version (forthcoming): CJ 103.1: 116–19
Agrippina the Younger has been an intriguing subject for historians of the
early Roman Empire from the time of Tacitus to our own. A powerful woman in
a world controlled by men, the sister, wife and mother of Caligula,
Claudius and Nero respectively, she has generally been viewed as
manipulative and ruthless. Yet, as Anthony Barrett noted in his recent
biography, “The actual record … suggests very strongly that both ancient
and modern writers offer a lop-sided portrait.” Barrett revised that
portrait by illuminating Agrippina’s accomplishments within the context of
the opportunities available to her. In Representing Agrippina, Judith
Ginsburg has shifted attention to the evidence itself, asking why and how
the positive images of the material evidence and Agrippina’s contrasting
negative characterization in ancient writers developed, and what the
implications of these representations might be. To answer these questions,
G. examines the literary evidence, the visual portrayals and rhetorical
stereotypes in three separate chapters. By the book’s end, the reader can
see how those writing about Agrippina, especially Tacitus, conflated her
actions with the stereotypes of scheming women, partly to denigrate
overly-ambitious women and partly to criticize imperial rule. The visual
remains, on the other hand, reveal the imperial household’s use of
Agrippina’s links to the Julio-Claudian past and future and her
assimilation to Demeter to bolster legitimacy and stability.
Chapter One, “Agrippina in the Literary Tradition,” reviews Agrippina’s
manipulative character in the literature. G. uses the evidence of Tacitus
primarily, with occasional pertinent passages from Dio or Suetonius. The
exceptional sensitivity with which G. has always analyzed Tacitus’
writings, and which continues in this work, allows the reader to gain even
greater awareness of the author’s careful use of rhetorical and stylistic
devices, vocabulary and even elements from comedy. With astute analysis, G.
shows that Tacitus depicts Agrippina as a woman whose every action was
attributable to political ambition. Actions that involve step-motherly
intrigue, hypocrisy, female jealousy and a public display of dominance all
expose “her own desire for power” (p. 33). Because of Tacitus’ compelling
rhetoric, most scholars have accepted this literary image of Agrippina as
genuine.
The emperors themselves utilized Agrippina differently, as G. shows in
Chapter Two, “Visualizing Agrippina.” Here, G. separates the visual
material into three sections: coinage (convincingly subdivided into Roman
and provincial), sculpture and cameos. G. first reviews the history and
influence of imperial women on Roman coins before focusing on Agrippina
herself. She includes both obverse and reverse images of coins that
illustrate the messages of the imperial household and support her challenge
to those who hold the view that Agrippina’s political clout alone explains
her extraordinary presence on official coins (p. 57):
"(T)he complex roles that Agrippina’s image plays on the coinage, while
they might well be an accurate reflection of Agrippina’s real power in the
state, equally served the political interests of the three emperors with
whom she was connected."
All three emperors used Agrippina to emphasize concordia between Julian and
Claudian lines and to add validity to their own reigns. Her designation as
Augusta and assimilation to Ceres on Claudian coins also underscored her
role as the mother of the future emperor. The gold and silver issues of 54
and 55 CE, where Agrippina appears on the obverse with Nero, provide
additional confirmation of her value to the imperial household. G.’s denial
that these last two issues illustrate a weakening in Agrippina’s political
position in 55 and her claim that such an interpretation relies too heavily
on Tacitus’ Ann. 13.12–13, however, require substantiation.
Turning to sculpture, G. makes a strong case for the political significance
of Agrippina’s presence in statuary groups, especially at the Sebasteion at
Aphrodisias, where Agrippina appears twice, first with Claudius and then
with Nero (figures of both included). On both panels, although in different
ways, Agrippina is assimilated to Demeter and fertility, and as such she
represents “the continuation of the dynasty and a secure and orderly
succession, the prerequisite for the peace and prosperity of Roman society
at large” (p. 71). The more private cameos, especially the Gemma Claudia,
illustrate themes and ideological interests similar to those on coinage and
sculpture.
Ginsburg’s untimely death four years ago did not permit her to finish
Representing Agrippina. Erich Gruen, Natalie Kampen, Elizabeth Keitel and
Beth Severy-Hoven have added clearly marked, insightful introductions,
conclusions and occasional references. In the overall introduction,
however, Gruen acknowledges that a “somewhat unfinished quality remains”
(p. 4). This is most evident in Chapter Three, “Agrippina and the Power of
Rhetorical Stereotypes,” where G. returns to the literary evidence to
assess the cultural assumptions that led to the powerful rhetorical
stereotypes attached to Agrippina. With more time, G. would likely have
edited her claims about step-mothers and the dux femina that are repeated
from Chapter One (as well as removing repetitive statements there) and more
fully developed her arguments to cover evidence beyond Tacitus.
Nonetheless, what G. says is important. In fact, the juxtaposition of her
detailed analysis of the development of the stereotypes of the saeva
noverca, dux femina and sexual transgressor with her examination of the
material evidence about Agrippina in Chapter Two is one of the strongest
features of the book and makes her conclusions in both chapters even more
convincing. In this chapter, G. shows how these negative stereotypes,
developed during the late republic, were used in the imperial period “to
cast opprobrium on the men with whom these women were associated and to
discourage aristocratic and imperial women from challenging the male
monopoly of the Roman political system” (pp. 106–7). Tacitus masterfully
exploited the stereotypes in his criticism of the emperors linked with
Agrippina and the political system as a whole: the dominatio that Agrippina
gained through dubious tactics was a manifestation of a dysfunctional
imperial regime.
In her introduction to Chapter Two, Ginsburg wrote that “the hostile
tradition of the literary sources … continues to leave its mark on even the
most respected scholars as they confront the Agrippina of coins, sculpture,
and cameos” (p. 55). Now we can cast a more critical eye on the evidence of
both media because G. has clarified the various agendas, cultural notions
and imperial aims of those representing Agrippina.
KATHRYN WILLIAMS
Canisius College
You may remove yourself from the CJ-Online list-serve by sending an
email to: [log in to unmask]
Leave the subject line blank, and in the first line of the message
write: UNSUBSCRIBE cj-online
|