PROBEUSERS Archives

June 2010

PROBEUSERS@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
JEOL-Focused Probe Users List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Steven Cogswell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Jun 2010 07:06:56 -0300
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary=0015175ce2122e39680487f522b5
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
JEOL-Focused Probe Users List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1101 bytes) , text/html (1215 bytes)
JEOL Probe Users Listserver

Moderator: Ellery Frahm, [log in to unmask],
Electron Microprobe Lab, University of Minnesota

Post a message: send your message to [log in to unmask]

Unsubscribe: send "SIGNOFF PROBEUSERS" to [log in to unmask]

On-line help and FAQ: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu/listserver.html



*

Hello;

I'd like to clarify my position in the question I asked yesterday.

I have no intention of getting rid of the bubble device, and I have no
intention of getting rid of P10.   I use the system now with a regulator, a
needle valve, and the bubble meter.  My needle valve is unmarked as to
range, and is really too coarse for fine control over the rate - with the
side effect that if you bump  the needle valve knob the flow rate changes a
lot.   My intention is to replace this with a finer control rotameter which
has the needle control valve and a visual sight gauge to let you know that
it's actually set correct.   Since the JEOL spec doesn't actually say what
the flow rate is in l/min (or at least I can't find it) I figured I would
ask if anyone knew.

Have a nice day.

Best regards,
Steven Cogswell


ATOM RSS1 RSS2