PROBEUSERS Archives

October 2016

PROBEUSERS@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Message-ID:
Sender:
JEOL-Focused Probe Users List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Fernando Colombo <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 14 Oct 2016 13:12:03 +0000
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_253770_1865236389.1476450723373"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Fernando Colombo <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (949 bytes) , text/html (1939 bytes)
Hi,
Some time ago I analyzed monazite. Later, when checking the .cor file, I found in the "Standard data" section that the ThO2 concentration was listed as 96.1180 (mass %). Since I am using a pure ThO2 standard, first I thought that I had entered the wrong numbers in the Standard Manager screen. However, after checking it, it was correct (100.00 % ThO2). When I analize the Th standard as an unknown, I do get about 96% ThO2. Any suggestion on how to correct this (other than multiplying the ThO2 result by 100/96.118) will be most appreciated.
Fernando ColomboLAMARX - Universidad Nacional de CórdobaArgentina

****
JEOL Probe Users Listserver

Moderator: Anette von der Handt, [log in to unmask],
Electron Microprobe Lab, University of Minnesota

Post a message: send your message to [log in to unmask]

Unsubscribe: send "SIGNOFF PROBEUSERS" to [log in to unmask]

On-line help and FAQ: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu/jeoluserlist.html

*

ATOM RSS1 RSS2