PUBPOL-L Archives

March 2003

PUBPOL-L@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Alistair Howard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Alistair Howard <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:50:04 -0500
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (112 lines)
_-- Public Policy Network - Posting to [log in to unmask] --_

I would be happy to see this list move to more of a policy discussion list
(including, for me, teaching issues). I've been a lurker because the list
has been so quiet.... but....

One thing to start us off with might be the relative influence of civilian
and military policy analysts in the current war...it seems to me that the
civilian (neo-con) types like Perle etc have overruled the military
conventoin that we go in with maximum force. They expected less
resistance, and wanted to win/thought they could win the hearts and
minds...so we have the odd situation of a Republican administration going
in with insufficient force.

Incidentally, I oppose the war, think the force we're using is clearly
bloody horrible for the victims, etc...etc... But I am very interested in
the empirical question of how important, and which, policy analysts have
been/are.

I'd love to hear anyone's views.

______________________________________________________________________
Alistair Howard (Alix)   Visiting Instructor
Temple University Political Science Department

All syllabi are available on my webpage: astro.temple.edu/~alistair

Home: 215 402-9906  Mobile: 215 518-1232 [log in to unmask]


On Fri, 28 Mar 2003, John Wilmerding wrote:

> _-- Public Policy Network - Posting to [log in to unmask] --_
>
> Those who have nothing to say should not tell others to say nothing.
>
> I am making use of this list to review and debate topics in public policy, I think we can take Michael Shires' efforts to censor this list at the very least 'with a grain of salt' ...
>
> The list description says "... topics covered in posting include current public policy issues, events and conferences, research, teaching, curriculum and courses, employment and career opportunities, activities of public policy practitioners, announcements of relevant Internet resources, and other topics of interest."
>
> How convenient for his point that he omits "topics" including:
>
> (1) current public policy issues;
> (2) research;
> (3) teaching, curriculum and courses;
> (4) employment and career opportunities;
> (5) activities of public policy practitioners;
> (6) announcements of relevant Internet resources;
> ... and, of course ...
> (7) other topics of interest.
>
> I've been on this list on and off for five years.  During that time it has been pretty much dead.  Just during the past year or so its subscribership has dropped 25% ... but it's still over 600, which makes it potentially a very useful resource for responsible discussion of important public policy issues.
>
> I suggest that particularly during this national and international emergency, we continue to use it for public policy debates ... at least to some extent.  Internet e-lists everywhere have proven that they can "self-moderate" (which is the stated principle of this list).
>
> The list is especially needed now that the practical weakening of anti-trust legislation has resulted in major corporate interests owning nearly all the mass media outlets in the USA, and thus stifling any public policy debates in those fora.  That's another discussion in and of itselt.
>
> John Wilmerding
>
> P.S.:  Oh, and Michael, since you are at Pepperdine, you really should know that your use of 'sight' is incorrect.  It was presumably 'web sites' you were speaking of.  Moreover, email lists are not regarded as web sites.
>
> On Friday, March 28, 2003, Michael Shires <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
> Can we please move this conversation to a discussion sight.  This list is
> for events, conferences, activities and professional issues, not public
> policy debates.
>
> Reply from Michael A. Shires, Pepperdine School of Public Policy
>
> ==================================
> [log in to unmask]            [log in to unmask]
> -------------------------------------------
> John Wilmerding, Convener and List Manager
> Coalition for Equity-Restorative Justice (CERJ)
> 1 Chestnut Hill, Brattleboro, VT, ZIP: 05301-6073
> Phone: 1-802-254-2826 | 1-802-380-0664 (cellular)
> CERJ was founded in New York in May, 1997.
> -------------------------------------------
> "Work together to reinvent justice using methods
> that are fair; that conserve, restore, and even
> create harmony, equity and good will in society."
> -------------------------------------------
> To join (or leave) the CERJ email list, kindly send
> me an email message at [log in to unmask]
> or at [log in to unmask]  I'll need your first & last name,
> your email address, and your state, province or
> country of residence.  Thank you!  -- John W.
> ==================================
>
> _-------                                -------_
>         Public Policy Network - PUBPOL-L
>   Supported by the Public Affairs Student Assoc.
>   Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs
>            University of Minnesota
>     http://www.hhh.umn.edu/pubpol/pubpol.htm
>   Commands to:  [log in to unmask]
>   Subscribe: SUB PUBPOL-L "Your Name"
> _ Unsubscribe: UNSUB PUBPOL-L                  _
>  -------                                -------
>

_-------                                -------_
        Public Policy Network - PUBPOL-L
  Supported by the Public Affairs Student Assoc.
  Hubert H. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs
           University of Minnesota
    http://www.hhh.umn.edu/pubpol/pubpol.htm
  Commands to:  [log in to unmask]
  Subscribe: SUB PUBPOL-L "Your Name"
_ Unsubscribe: UNSUB PUBPOL-L                  _
 -------                                -------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2