Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 5 Apr 2007 09:27:04 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
JEOL Probe Users Listserver
Moderator: Ellery Frahm, [log in to unmask],
Electron Microprobe Lab, University of Minnesota
Post a message: send your message to [log in to unmask]
Unsubscribe: send "SIGNOFF PROBEUSERS" to [log in to unmask]
On-line help and FAQ: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu/listserver.html
*
Hello Ron,
At 4/4/2007 11:23 PM, you wrote:
>When is it possible to do a quantitative analysis on a probe with a
>rastered beam on an inhomogeneous sample?
I sometimes use a defocussed beam, but for the reason mentioned by
Andy Buckley I stay away from rastering. The JEOL 8200 has a "beam
diameter" parameter in its EOS setup, which is fairly accurate
judging from materials that show the "burn" spot.
Right now I am engaged in a quantitative study how well that works
for various alloys. One thing I am still missing is a probe that
would allow me to measure the beam intensity across a defocussed
beam, although I think it will be more uniform than across a raster.
Many years ago we also tried Li-borate fusion for rock analysis (on
samples too small for our XRF), which seemed to work o.k., but didn't
pursue it past the initial tests.
Alfred
Alfred Kracher
Ames Laboratory (USDOE)
Iowa State University
227 Wilhelm Hall
Ames, IA 50011-3020
Tel.: 515 294 7097
|
|
|