Sender: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 14 May 2007 02:37:34 -0500 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I don't see why we can't write something that allows us to break down
XML files into less complicated blocks of files. This is definitely
something that should get written.
Along the lines of managing complexity, it were best we had a real user
interface for authoring these rule sets. I would like to see something
that manages the creation of object mappings to propositional variables,
and the large-scale authoring and categorization of rule subsets.
Ideally users would never even see the XML file, but it would be
packaged in a manner similar to how OpenOffice packages its XML file
descriptors.
It is not a high priority for me to write this at the moment, however.
Still, I believe it is in the JIRA.
Best,
--
Alexander Saint Croix
Nate Kautz wrote:
> I noticed that the baseball.xml file is quite simple and short. It's
> easy
> to read. But what about larger, more complicated examples with dozens or
> hundreds or premises, consequences, and hypotheses? Will there be or is
> there currently a way to break them down, possibly into categories (e.g.
> citrus serving vs. player running the base). Thanks.
|
|
|