JEOL Probe Users Listserver
Moderator: Ellery Frahm, [log in to unmask],
Electron Microprobe Lab, University of Minnesota
Post a message: send your message to [log in to unmask]
Unsubscribe: send "SIGNOFF PROBEUSERS" to [log in to unmask]
On-line help and FAQ: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu/listserver.html
*
Ellery and Marc,
We have just had our SX-100 refitted with such an electron
source but have not experimented with it yet.
There are advantages to the system, principally in a longer
lasting and brighter source. However, even with an infinitely narrow
beam, the analytical volume cannot be reduced below a fixed amount,
typically 1-2 microns across if the operating voltage is 10-15 kV,
also depending of course on the ave. Z of the specimen. The volume
is reduced considerably if operating at a few kV, but then one cannot
excite characteristic X-ray lines that can be detected for many
elements.
eric
On Sep 27, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Ellery Frahm wrote:
> JEOL Probe Users Listserver
>
> Moderator: Ellery Frahm, [log in to unmask],
> Electron Microprobe Lab, University of Minnesota
>
> Post a message: send your message to [log in to unmask]
>
> Unsubscribe: send "SIGNOFF PROBEUSERS" to [log in to unmask]
>
> On-line help and FAQ: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu/listserver.html
>
>
>
> *
>
> Probe folks,
>
> Today I received the following message from one of the professors
> in our department:
>
>> Ellery,
>>
>> I was just at a meeting where a colleague was telling me about his
>> SX-100 microprobe and the amazing improved spatial resolution it
>> gets for both imaging and quantiative analyses owing to the LaB6
>> source. It's my understanding that JEOL sells the 8200 with an
>> option of a LaB6 or tungsten filament source. Do you know if JEOL
>> will retrofit 8900s with Lab6 and if so, how much it costs? The
>> fellow with the SX100 says that Cameca charges something like $10k
>> extra for a LaB6 source on the SX-100...
>>
>> Marc
>
> Is such a refit possible or feasible? I know it is easy to go from
> LaB6 to W filament, but it seems harder to go the other way. I
> believe that we'd need an ion pump at the top of the column for
> LaB6, but would a turbo pump need necessary too or are diffusion
> pumps okay? Are the electronics, heating system, etc. the same or
> not?
>
> I am also curious if anyone is currently running or has recently
> run a LaB6-outfitted machine. Are the concerns about beam
> stability valid, or is the issue overblown? What is the typically
> stability in your experience? What are current opinions about
> LaB6? Having never used a LaB6-equipped microprobe, I don't have
> any first-hand experience or observations on which to draw.
>
> Any facts, observations, opinions, wild speculations, or hearsay
> are welcome.
>
> Best,
> Ellery
>
> --------------------
> Ellery E. Frahm
> Research Fellow & Manager
> Electron Microprobe Laboratory
> University of Minnesota - Twin Cities
> Department of Geology & Geophysics
> Lab Website: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu
> Personal Website: http://umn.edu/~frah0010
>
>
|