CJ-ONLINE Archives

November 2007

CJ-ONLINE@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Classical Journal On-Line <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:15:30 -0600
Content-Type:
multipart/mixed
Parts/Attachments:
Online Exclusive. Adobe PDF attached.

The Chrysokamino Metallurgy Workshop and its Territory. By PHILIP P.
BETANCOURT. Hesperia Supplement 36. Princeton: ASCSA Publications, 2006.
Pp. xxii + 462. Paper, $65.00. ISBN 978–0–87661–536–2.

Order this text for $59.00 from Amazon.com using this link and benefit
CAMWS and the Classical Journal:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect-home/classjourn-20

At first glance, this book is the stunningly timely publication of
archaeological research revolving around a metallurgy workshop and its
broader geographical, social and historical context in the gulf of
Mirabello in East Crete. More specifically, it is the publication of the
excavation of a FN–EMIII metallurgy workshop at Chrysokamino, the survey of
the surrounding area (a farmstead last inhabited in LMIIIB) and the
typological study of pottery from an older excavation at the neighboring
cave of Theriospilio. However, there is more than meets the eye in this
volume: the reader is presented with an exemplary way of designing,
implementing, undertaking and presenting archaeological research; last, and
certainly to the students of ancient metallurgical practices not least, all
significant trends in archaeometallurgy are discussed accurately and
concisely by experts such as P. Betancourt and J.D. Muhly, covering
chronologically the 20th century and forward, and spanning geographically
the Mediterranean and beyond.

Philip P. Betancourt oversaw the implementation of both the research
project and the publication of the results. The volume is divided into
three parts with chapters composed by different specialists. An extensive
and useful series of Appendices follows, again the work of various
contributors (pp. 281–432).

Part I, The Chrysokamino Territory (pp.3–46), begins with an introduction
by Betancourt (Ch. 1). An interesting feature of this introduction is the
discussion of modern toponyms of the area under investigation; this is
uncommon in publications of archaeological excavations and surveys and
makes clear the holistic approach of the project from its inception. After
a brief discussion of previous research in the vicinity, Betancourt sets
out the primary research goals: emphasis was given to the metallurgical
workshop (its excavation established dates between the FN–EMIII); and a
study of neighboring farmsteads was conducted for their potential
association with the workshop, along with a survey of the area to establish
a general context for the excavation finds. One notes (p. 18) how the
“archaeological plan” (p. 18) is presented in a typical processual manner.
Ch. 2 is a study of the climate conditions, the geology and mineralogy, and
the topography of Chrysokamino in the Early Bronze Age (EBA). The summary
on p. 38 is useful for those who only need to form a general idea of the
environmental conditions of the region.

In Part II, the results and conclusions of the excavation of the metallurgy
workshop are presented in a multi-disciplinary manner. Each chapter
concerns a different aspect of research on the workshop and is composed by
a different specialist (pp. 47–192).

Ch.3 presents the excavation methodology in detail. The workshop site was
excavated (after a survey in 1995) for two continuous seasons (1996 and
1997) in the grid-square system. The methodology can be described as
systematic, thorough, careful and “rigorous”, in the researchers’ own words
(p. 61). Ch.4 attempts to reconstruct the history of the apsidal
structure’s use. The apsidal structure was the only architectural feature
unearthed on the Chrysokamino workshop site, amidst a vast slag heap and
pieces of pottery and industrial ceramics; three floor layers were
discovered, along with eight postholes. Sherds associated with the floors
belong to the EMIII–MMIA periods. No evidence, however was found to suggest
their primary use in the structure; they were carried there along with the
soil that formed the floors (p. 61). The structure is interpreted as a
small kitchen or storage space for the smelters (p. 63). I find the
argument incomplete, due to the lack of evidence, although one cannot
exclude such a possibility. The major problem is that metallurgical
installations of comparable date in the Aegean remain largely unexcavated.
One might suggest a glance at comparative material from other times
(certainly not in the form of “ethnographic parallel” or “analogy”) as a
source of ideas regarding the use of the hut at Chrysokamino. This would
require more attention to the sociocultural context of EBA Aegean
metallurgical practices, an understudied aspect of EBA Aegean metallurgy.
The pottery dating between FN–EMIII–MMIA is presented in Ch. 5. No complete
vessels were found. The pottery is studied in two separate groups: that
from the slag pile and that from the apsidal structure. However, there
seems to be no justification for this division. The pottery analysis is
followed by a detailed catalogue with accurately executed drawings (pp.
73–97).

Stone tools (Ch. 6) are rare finds at the metallurgy workshop of
Chrysokamino, something unsurprising in the context of EBA Aegean
metallurgy. EBA smelters had no reason to abandon fully or even partially
functioning tools. Indeed, such tools are more commonly associated with
settlements rather than industrial sites in the Aegean (cf. n. 1, above:
Ayios Sostis on Siphnos).

Ceramic fragments of smelting furnaces are treated separately (Ch. 7)—and
rightly so, since their manufacture and use both differ substantially from
those of clay vessels. The conclusion that the fragments were part of
cylinder chimneys is convincing. Also, the drawings of reconstructed
furnaces are very informative for the reader who might not be familiar with
pre-industrial metallurgical practices (p. 111, fig. 7.3). In the
“Implications” section (p. 113), there is a stimulating, albeit not
elaborate, discussion of social issues pertaining to EBA Aegean metallurgy.

Chs. 8–10 present bellows, miscellaneous ceramics and the so-called
uncatalogued metallurgy materials (slag and ore among other things),
respectively. Beyond typology, all three chapters contribute to the
reconstruction of the metallurgical process, and this is where their
greatest value lies. Significant for students of ancient metallurgy is the
statement (supported by adequate analytical data in the appendix) that
samples were analyzed “by more than one method” (p. 140). With regard to
the conclusions on p. 144, the designation “not profitable” is used as an
argument to support the view that “skilled metalworkers” were not employed
for the preparation (beneficiation) of the ore to be smelted. Such
attributes should be used with caution, since too little is known about the
sociocultural circumstances of EBA Aegean metallurgy to be able to infer
who was skilled at doing what, the level of competence of the individuals
involved in the metallurgical process, or even the social standing of
metallurgists and their craft. (Was the art of metallurgy open to all? Or
was it a privilege restricted to certain members of the community?) On p.
144, an important point is made and should not pass unnoticed: the evidence
points toward the use of multiple ore sources, making identification of
specific ore bodies (i.e., Kythnos; Laurion) either by lead isotope or
elemental composition analysis impossible. This should suffice to put an
end to the heated lead isotope analysis debate of the 1990s. On the other
hand, the discussion of the (deliberate?) use of arsenic is inconclusive.

The next two chapters discuss fauna (Ch. 11), which reveals a diet pattern
comprising mostly shellfish, and possible evidence of threshing (Ch. 12).
Chapter 13 can stand alone and is likely to be considered seminal and
crucial to Aegean metallurgy discussion for years to come. In this chapter,
J.D. Muhly presents his vast knowledge and acute critical insight,
re-writing the history of East Mediterranean and Balkan—not solely
Aegean—metallurgy in about 25 pages. Anyone who wishes to study Bronze Age
metallurgy could start with Muhly’s contribution. Especially important is
his review of the research—both published and unpublished—conducted in the
last two decades, as well as the compilation of a very up-to-date
bibliography. Chapter 14 summarizes parts I and II, connects them with the
analytical data presented in the appendices, and views the finds at
Chrysokamino in their broader Aegean craft-specialization context.

Part III concerns the surface survey which formed an integral part of the
Crysokamino project. Ch. 15 lays out the methodology (cf. Ch. 3, see
above). Emphasis is placed on timely publication—a crucial matter for
research in the Aegean, since many projects remain unpublished, making
finds inaccessible to other researchers. Ch. 16 revolves around topography,
while Ch. 17 is a somewhat preliminary report of the mostly LM habitation
site, awaiting its promised final publication in a separate volume. Ch. 18
lays out the history of Edith Hall’s early 20th century excavation of the
cave of Theriospilio, based on her personal correspondence. (Hall never
published her excavation results and finds). The catalogue of the pottery
Hall found is useful for study purposes, since for the most part the sherds
are scattered in various collections, and raises the crucial issue of
chronology between the FN/EBI in the Aegean.

Chs. 19–21 can be read in conjunction. In Ch. 19, Haggis reconstructs a
habitation context for the metallurgy workshop, based on an earlier survey
(conducted in 1989–90). Of particular importance are pp. 227–8, where the
changes marked in the EMIII–MMIA period indicate increased social
stratification. In Ch. 20, territorial boundaries are defined, separately
for each period, based on a methodology initially developed for the study
of Roman farms and estates (p. 236). A tentative outline of boundaries in
the region under study is attempted. The figures that accompany the text
are a great aid to the reader of this somewhat technical chapter. Ch. 21
refers to the use of land on the farmstead. It examines agricultural
practices, looking into factors that affect them, such as soil types,
climate changes and topographic features (i.e. availability of arable
land). It presents an interesting classification of land use and proceeds
to analyze the suggested categories.

Ch. 22 presents the survey conclusions. Already in the opening paragraph,
all the important points of the last three chapters are presented, ending
with a notable comment: “The history of Chrysokamino shows that cultural
change, as others have suggested, is usually based on complex forces of
formation and dissolution rather than on a strictly linear, gradual
development” (p. 257)—although it is doubtful whether scholars still think
of change in linear terms. The last two pages of the chapter (pp. 277–8)
examine the situation of the Chrysokamino territory well into the 20th
century, offering an interesting diachronic approach as well as an
impromptu lesson in contemporary Greek history.

The Appendices revolve around laboratory analyses of artifacts found in the
excavation of the Chrysokamino workshop and survey of the region. It is
extremely important that all authors present all parameters of their work
in utmost detail, not simply charts and numbers, so as to make their
research results comparable and secure their reliability and scholarly and
scientific integrity.

The volume is richly illustrated with photographs and drawings, accompanied
by carefully composed captions, aiming at scientific and scholarly accuracy
rather than impressive views of coffee-table quality. The book is very
informative and written in a manner accessible to non-specialists, without
compromising scholarly accuracy. A glossary of technical terms would have
been a welcome addition, although such terms are certainly defined in
individual chapters. This is not merely a site publication, but might also
be used as a companion to the study of archaeometallurgy. Publication
quality is high, with almost no typos. The bibliography (pp. 433–56) is
up-to-date and complete and the index at the end of the volume is
exhaustive (pp. 457–62). In short, Chrysokamino constitutes a publication
par excellence. One only hopes that Aegean metallurgy-related publications
in the future will follow the lead of Betanourt’s Chrysokamino.

ATHENA HADJI
School of Architecture, University of Patras [log in to unmask]


LIST OF CHAPTERS AND CONTRIBUTORS

Part I: The Chrysokamino Territory
Chapter 1: Ph. P. Betancourt: Introduction, 3–18.

Chapter 2: Ph. P. Betancourt, W.R. Farrand: The Natural Environment, 19–46

Part II: The Metallurgy Workshop Chapter 3: Ph. P. Betancourt, J.D. Muhly,
E.A. Armpis, R.S. Powell, E.B. Shank, E. Sikla, T. Yangaki: The Excavation
of the Metallurgy Workshop, 47–54.

Chapter 4: Ph. P. Betancourt: The Apsidal Structure, 55–66.

Chapter 5: Ph. P. Betancourt: The Pottery, 67–98.

Chapter 6: D. Evely: The Stone Tools, 99–108.

Chapter 7: Ph. P. Betancourt: The Furnace Chimney Fragments, 109–24.

Chapter 8: Ph. P. Betancourt, J.D. Muhly: The Pot Bellows, 125–32.

Chapter 9: S.C. Ferrence, B. Koukaras: Micellaneous Ceramic Artifacts,
133–6.

Chapter 10: Ph. P. Betancourt: Other Metallurgical Materials, 137–48.

Chapter 11: D.S. Reese: Faunal Remains, 149–52.

Chapter 12: G. Jones, A. Schofield: Evidence for the Use of Threshing
Remains at the Early Minoan Metallurgical Workshop, 153–78.

Chapter 13: J.D. Muhly: Chrysokamino in the History of Early Metallurgy,
155–78.

Chapter 14: Ph. P. Betancourt: Discussion of the Workshop and
Reconstruction of the Smelting Practices, 179–92.

Part III: The Surface Survey
Chapter 15: Ph. P. Betancourt: Introduction to the Surface Survey, 193–6.

Chapter 16: L. Onyshkevych, W.B. Hafford: Topography of the Chrysokamino
Region, 197–204.

Chapter 17: Ch. R. Floyd, A Summary of the Habitation Site at
Chrysokamino-Chomatas, 205–14.

Chapter 18: Ph. P. Betancourt, Ch. R. Floyd: Edith Hall’s Excavations in
the Theriospelio Cave, 215–20.

Chapter 19: D.C. Haggis, Chrysokamino in Context: A Regional Archaeological
Survey, 221–32.

Chapter 20: Ph. P. Betancourt: The geographic Boundaries of the
Chrysokamino Farmstead Territory, 233–40.

Chapter 21: Ph. P. Betancourt: Land Use on the Chrysokamino Farmstead,
241–56.

Chapter 22: Ph. P. Betancourt: Survey Conclusions, 257–80.

Appendixes Appendix A: G.H. Myer, Ph. P. Betancourt: Petrography and X-Ray
Diffraction Analysis of Slags and Furnace Chimneys, 281–92.

Appendix B: Y. Bassiakos: SEM/EDAX Analysis, 293–8.

Appendix C: Z. Stos, N. Gale: Lead Isotope and Chemical Analysis of Slags
from Chrysokamino, 299–320.

Appendix D: S.C. Ferrence, Ch. P. Swann: Arsenic Content of Copper Prills:
A Study Applying PIXE, 321–4.

Appendix E: Ch. M. Thompson: Slag Analysis by Wavelength Dispersive
Spectrometry, 325–8.

Appendix F: Y. Bassiakos, M. Catapotis: Reconstruction of the Copper
Smelting Process at the Chrysokamino Bases on the Analysis of Ore and Slag
Samples, 329–54.

Appendix G: Ph. P. Betancourt, L. Onyshkevych, W.B. Hafford: Register of
Anthropogenic Features, 355–76.

Appendix H: Ph. P. Betancourt: The Minoan Pottery from the Survey, 377–90.

Appendix I: S.C. Ferrence, E.B. Shank: Evidence for Beekeeping, 391–2.

Appendix J: N. Poulou-Papadimitriou: The Byzantine to Ottoman Pottery from
the Survey, 393–8.

Appendix K: B. Crowell, Ph. P. Betancourt: The Excavation of Cave AF 9 and
Terrace AF 22b, 399–402.

Appendix L: E. Nodarou: Soils and Sediments from Natural Deposits at
Chrysokamino, 403–12.

Appendix M: R.F. Beeston, J. Palatinus, C. Beck, E.C. Stout: Organic
Residue Analysis of Pottery Sherds from Chrysokamino, 413–28.

Appendix N: E. Nodarou: Petrographic Analysis of Two Final Neolithic Sherds
from the Chrysokamino Metallurgy Location, 429–32.


You may remove yourself from the CJ-Online list-serve by sending an
email to: [log in to unmask]
Leave the subject line blank, and in the first line of the message
write: UNSUBSCRIBE cj-online

ATOM RSS1 RSS2