PROBEUSERS Archives

September 2020

PROBEUSERS@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:
Thu, 24 Sep 2020 04:45:42 -0500
Reply-To:
JEOL-Focused Probe Users List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: TAPJ, TAPH, TAPL or TAP?
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Message-ID:
<[log in to unmask]>
Sender:
JEOL-Focused Probe Users List <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Radek Michallik <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines) 
Hi and thank you all for the quick reply.

Indeed, Johan vs Johansson crystals makes sense. Is not the resolution better with Johansson crystals? What is the benefit of the Johan geometry compared to the Johansson, then? Are they cheaper? More durable? 

Rgds,
Radek

****
JEOL Probe Users Listserver

Moderator: Anette von der Handt, [log in to unmask],
Electron Microprobe Lab, University of Minnesota

Post a message: send your message to [log in to unmask]

Unsubscribe: send "SIGNOFF PROBEUSERS" to [log in to unmask]

On-line help and FAQ: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu/jeoluserlist.html

*

ATOM RSS1 RSS2