JEOL Probe Users Listserver Moderator: Ellery Frahm, [log in to unmask], Electron Microprobe Lab, University of Minnesota Post a message: send your message to [log in to unmask] Unsubscribe: send "SIGNOFF PROBEUSERS" to [log in to unmask] On-line help and FAQ: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu/listserver.html * Ellery and Marc, We have just had our SX-100 refitted with such an electron source but have not experimented with it yet. There are advantages to the system, principally in a longer lasting and brighter source. However, even with an infinitely narrow beam, the analytical volume cannot be reduced below a fixed amount, typically 1-2 microns across if the operating voltage is 10-15 kV, also depending of course on the ave. Z of the specimen. The volume is reduced considerably if operating at a few kV, but then one cannot excite characteristic X-ray lines that can be detected for many elements. eric On Sep 27, 2007, at 12:42 PM, Ellery Frahm wrote: > JEOL Probe Users Listserver > > Moderator: Ellery Frahm, [log in to unmask], > Electron Microprobe Lab, University of Minnesota > > Post a message: send your message to [log in to unmask] > > Unsubscribe: send "SIGNOFF PROBEUSERS" to [log in to unmask] > > On-line help and FAQ: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu/listserver.html > > > > * > > Probe folks, > > Today I received the following message from one of the professors > in our department: > >> Ellery, >> >> I was just at a meeting where a colleague was telling me about his >> SX-100 microprobe and the amazing improved spatial resolution it >> gets for both imaging and quantiative analyses owing to the LaB6 >> source. It's my understanding that JEOL sells the 8200 with an >> option of a LaB6 or tungsten filament source. Do you know if JEOL >> will retrofit 8900s with Lab6 and if so, how much it costs? The >> fellow with the SX100 says that Cameca charges something like $10k >> extra for a LaB6 source on the SX-100... >> >> Marc > > Is such a refit possible or feasible? I know it is easy to go from > LaB6 to W filament, but it seems harder to go the other way. I > believe that we'd need an ion pump at the top of the column for > LaB6, but would a turbo pump need necessary too or are diffusion > pumps okay? Are the electronics, heating system, etc. the same or > not? > > I am also curious if anyone is currently running or has recently > run a LaB6-outfitted machine. Are the concerns about beam > stability valid, or is the issue overblown? What is the typically > stability in your experience? What are current opinions about > LaB6? Having never used a LaB6-equipped microprobe, I don't have > any first-hand experience or observations on which to draw. > > Any facts, observations, opinions, wild speculations, or hearsay > are welcome. > > Best, > Ellery > > -------------------- > Ellery E. Frahm > Research Fellow & Manager > Electron Microprobe Laboratory > University of Minnesota - Twin Cities > Department of Geology & Geophysics > Lab Website: http://probelab.geo.umn.edu > Personal Website: http://umn.edu/~frah0010 > >