[log in to unmask] .  I only see a benefit to Google Wave when more people have access to it.  Right now I only have a couple contacts and there isn't much to do because they are contacts I don't normally collaborate with.

Tom Stanoch

Tony Thomas wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">Good idea: [log in to unmask]

On Oct 22, 2009, at 9:42 AM, David Naughton wrote:


How about if those of us on Wave share our addresses? I'm [log in to unmask].

On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 09:36:28AM -0500, Tony Thomas wrote:
I'm not sure how many of us at the U have preview access to Google
Wave yet, but it might be interesting to try to set up a Wave for the
Web Dev meetings as a way to discuss the meeting topics and follow up
with resources, links & etc. from the presenters. There may not be
time to get it going today, but perhaps at a future meeting.

I've had the opportunity to use Wave for real-time collaboration
recently. It's handy, even if still a little buggy.

My thought was one Wave per meeting. The Twin Cities Wave has been
fun, but has grown into monster. There's something to be said for
limiting the subject matter IMO.


Tom Stanoch
University of Minnesota Extension
405 Coffey Hall, St. Paul, MN 55108
UM Jabber IM: [log in to unmask]