Hi Ann

We use both Drupal and Contribute on our office.

Our expereince with Drupal hasn't been ideal, but may be due to how we modified Drupal and not Drupal itself.

On the other hand, we have had a great experience with Contribute.  Contribute works well if you are already using Dreamweaver templates, the number of editors is small, and there is no need for content to available in another system.   We had high hopes for InContext editing from Adobe that would esencially Contribute in a browser - but from what I can tell, Adobe dropped it. 

If you want more info, feel free contact me off list.


On 3/29/12 4:48 PM, Ann Nordby wrote:
[log in to unmask]" type="cite">Can I please have opinions on content management systems? 

1. Yes or no?
We are evaluating the benefits of going to a CMS. What are the chief benefits? We are currently using Dreamweaver. Would Adobe Contribute suffice if all is going well with my team of web contributors now? 

2. UMContent?  
Does UMContent work well for anyone? It is centrally supported and free. Any problems with it? 

Thank you for your opinions. 


Ann Nordby
Web manager
University of Minnesota | Extension Center for Youth Development
McNamara Alumni Center
200 Oak Street SE, #270B
Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA

[log in to unmask]

Read our blog!
Youth Development Insight

Kim Doberstein

User Interface Designer
Academic Support Resources (ASR)
160 Williamson Hall
University of Minnesota

612-625-8376 | [log in to unmask] 

Rah Rah Rah - Ski-U-Mah