CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 1997

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
UV -fiberoptics
From:
"Larsen, Birger B {LBKA}" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 19 Mar 1997 14:50:00 DST
Content-Type:
Text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
Text/plain (22 lines) 
Dear UV - confocal users

   I would be glad to hear some opinions on fiberoptic coupling of
UV-lasers to the scanning systems vs. direct coupling. Noran and Biorad
both claim that they have direct coupling due to the fact that the
UV-fiberoptics wear out with time, while Zeiss and Leica says that their
fibers remain stable. Could you comment on this?

Cheers Birger
____________________________________________________

Birger Brodin,  Research fellow, Ph.D.
Biochemical Dept., August Krogh Institute
University of Copenhagen
Universitetsparken 13, DK-2100 Copenhagen

Voice + 45 35 32 17 06
Fax    + 45 35 32 15 67
Email  [log in to unmask]

____________________________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2