Dear Dave,
Good question, especially as early MRC 500 and 600 scopes (as well
as others) almost never filled the BFP.
Not filling the BFP means that no light goes through the high-NA part
of the lens. Hence, it operates as though it was of lower NA, the
spot is bigger than it should be and the peak power is less.
However, the "good news" is that low-NA lenses are much less subject
to the effects of spherical aberration. So the bad performance you
get from having a big spot is somewhat offset by the fact that this
performance doesn't get worse quite so fast as you focus down into a
specimen having the wrong refractive index.
However, because the emitted light goes in all directions, the
collection light path does operate at the full NA of the objective.
For this reason, you may not immediately notice either of these
effects of not filling the BFP. Nonetheless, the resolution will be
less and, given a reasonably small pinhole, so will the signal level.
This, in a nutshell, is the reason that the early Bio-Rads worked
better with a 100x NA 1.4 than with the 60x NA 1.4 . The former lens
has a smaller BFP.
Jim P.
>Dear users- What is the effect of not filling the back focal aperture
>of an objective in a point scanning confocal system. I am assuming
>the same laser power going in, but the beam not expanded as far. It
>seems to me that it is a different issue than in a normal imaging
>sytem. Would you get a smaller spot of illumination? Thanks- Dave
>--
>
>************************************************************
>"Home of the 2000 NCAA Women's Basketball Champions"
>
>Dr. David Knecht
>Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
>University of Connecticut
>75 N. Eagleville Rd. U-125
>Storrs, CT 06269
>[log in to unmask]
>860-486-2200 860-486-4331 (fax)
>home page: http://www.sp.uconn.edu/~mcbstaff/knecht/knecht.html
>************************************************************
--
****************************************
Prof. James B. Pawley, (on Sabbatical) Ph. 61-2-9351-7548/2351
Room LG 10, Madsen Building, F-09, FAX 61-2-9351-7682
University of Sydney, NSW, 2006 Australia [log in to unmask]
"A scientist is not one who can answer questions but one who can
question answers." Theodore Schick Jr., Skeptical Enquirer,
21-2:39
|