CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

September 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Gold Standard immersion oil
From:
Beat Ludin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:06:51 +0200
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines) 
What about autofluorscence? Last time I tested this oil (which is 
quite a while ago) I found that it had very high autofluorescence. Of 
course, this is much more critical for widefield than for confocal.

Beat


At 18:32 24-09-2008, you wrote:
>Just doing some catching up on the listserv so sorry for the late reply, but
>I would also recommend the 37oC oil from Cargille. It has RI 1.52 at 37oC.
>
>Claire

ATOM RSS1 RSS2