Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 29 Jun 2011 08:20:20 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
Hello Hans,
We have/had very good experiences with the CoolLed, so I'd not hesitate
too much to go with it. Its only weakness is that it offers less intensity
then a typical (strong) metal-halide lamp. This may be a problem if you
use low NA low mag.oObjectives. For the 63x or 40x oil-immersion typically
used on a confocal this is not an issue.
Cheers Gabor
Light Microscopy Centre
ETH Zurich,
Schafmattstrasse 18
CH-8093, Zurich
Switzerland
Phone: +41 44 633 6221
On 6/29/11 9:56 AM, "H. de Bont" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>*****
>To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>*****
>
>Hello All,
>
>
>
>We are buying a new confocal/epi microscope.
>
>
>
>And are interested in experience of users with the CoolLED system.
>
>Do you recommend the CoolLED system over a metal halide lamp?
>
>We want to use the system with epi fluorescence of live cells with
>Hoechst,
>GFP and Cy3 channels.
>
>
>
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>
>
>Hans de Bont
>
>Dept of Toxicology
>
>LACDR
>
>University of Leiden
>
>Einsteinweg 55
>
>2333 CC Leiden
>
>The Netherlands
>
>Tel: 071-5274496
>
>Mobile: 06-11351598
>
>
|
|
|