CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

June 2007

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tim zhang <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:36:24 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (735 bytes) , text/html (995 bytes)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi, our group is considering buying a confocal microscope. We don't need super fancy stuff, like >4 channels, spectral capability, etc. Someone recommends Zeiss to me. I used to use Olympus product. After talking with Zeiss sales representatives, I found their price is way higher than Olympus product. I know Zeiss is renowned for its quality. But other than that, what are the reasons that people would rather to pay more? 

Tim



 
____________________________________________________________________________________
Need Mail bonding?
Go to the Yahoo! Mail Q&A for great tips from Yahoo! Answers users.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396546091

ATOM RSS1 RSS2