CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2015

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Anthony, Neil" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 20 Nov 2015 13:28:39 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (82 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Thank you both; I appreciate the advice. Great to know I have a couple of options.
Enjoy your weekends.
Neil


From: "Periasamy, Ammasi (ap3t)" <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Nov 19, 2015 11:21 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Autofluorescence in PFRET

Hello Neil
As Sheng mentioned you can use the spectral imaging approach. Or you can use the unlabeled cells to collect the signal to use for background subtraction. That will take care. The background subtraction should remove any autofluorescence or detector noise involved in fluorescence imaging.
Hope this helps.

Dr. Ammasi Periasamy
Professor & Center Director
http://www.kcci.virginia.edu/people/profile/ap3t
Phone: (434) 243-7602 or 982-4869
Fax: (434) 982-5210
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Office Location
W.M. Keck Center for Cellular Imaging
Physical and Life Sciences Building, (B 005)
At the intersection of Geldard dr and White head Rd.,
Mailing or Shipping Address:
W.M. Keck Center for Cellular Imaging (PLSB 005)
University of Virginia
Biology, Gilmer Hall, 409 McCormick Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA
FRET/FLIM Workshop-March 7-11, 2016: http://www.kcci.virginia.edu/workshop



-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of yuansheng.sun
Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2015 9:27 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Autofluorescence in PFRET

Then, it would be better to use spectral FRET.  Measure the reference spectrum of the autofluorescence from unlabeled sample.  Use linear unmixing to remove autofluorescence.

Sheng


Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device


-------- Original message --------
From: "Anthony, Neil" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:11/19/2015  3:06 PM  (GMT-06:00)
To: [log in to unmask]
Cc:
Subject: Autofluorescence in PFRET

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi all, I hope the science treats you well.

I was wondering if anybody's had any experience with autofluorescence when using PFRET, or PeriFRET as I like to call it.  I understand that autofluorescence is not accounted for in the algorithm?

Peri, I hope all is well with you.  Can I ask for some pointers on how think about the system if autofluorescence is the mix?

Thanks in advance for your time.

Neil

________________________________

This e-mail message (including any attachments) is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this message (including any attachments) is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by reply e-mail message and destroy all copies of the original message (including attachments).

ATOM RSS1 RSS2