CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

October 1996

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Paul Goodwin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 2 Oct 1996 14:51:53 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
How about some standard non-fluorescent nuclear stains like Geimsa or
Hematoxin (sp?).
 
________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
Paul Goodwin
Image Analysis Lab
FHCRC, Seattle, WA
 
On Wed, 2 Oct 1996, Michael J. Lyon wrote:
 
> I am looking for some help. I am trying to dissect out some very small
> <50 um blood vessels. The main problem is that I cannot see them once
> the blood has washed out.  I would like to stain the vessels with
> something that is compatible with immunohistochemical procedures using
> confocal microscopy.  I am concerned that the vessel staining will
> interfere with the fluorescence when viewed on the confocal either by
> scattering or autofluorescence.  Since alkaline phosphatase is present
> in most vessels and is still active after paraformaldehyde fixation,
> this should would work for the vessel stain.  I am using rats and most
> likely the method of Mayahara et al., Histochemie 11:88;1967.  Any
> advice would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2