CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

December 2004

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Martin Wessendorf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Dec 2004 12:59:33 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

David Knecht wrote:

> Is the excitation spot size for a laser scanning confocal microscope
> the same as that of an epifluorescence widefield microscope (same
> objective, etc.)?  Put another way, if I removed the PMT pinhole,
> would I get an image comparable to a widefield image?  Thanks- Dave

If I understand you correctly, the answer is no.  For a widefield
microscope, the entire field of view is illuminated at one time.  For a
confocal microscope (under ideal circumstances, at least), the area of
excitation is a diffraction-limited spot--i.e. it's sub-micron,
depending on wavelength and how you define the edge.

Martin
--
Martin Wessendorf, Ph.D.                   office: (612) 626-0145
Assoc Prof, Dept Neuroscience                 lab: (612) 624-2991
University of Minnesota             Preferred FAX: (612) 624-8118
6-145 Jackson Hall, 321 Church St. SE    Dept Fax: (612) 626-5009
Minneapolis, MN  55455                E-mail: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2