Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

What's the best method of making a sample more transparent to reduce scattering, without changing its chemistry too much? (other than methyl salicylate and glycerol).

Thanks.
Judy

Judy Trogadis
Bio-Imaging Coordinator
St. Michael's Hospital, 7Queen
30 Bond St.
Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
ph:  416-864-6060  x6337
pager: 416-685-9219
fax: 416-864-6043
[log in to unmask]


>>> Bill Miller <[log in to unmask]> 02/04/08 9:16 PM >>>
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal 

ultimately the lower NA with its longer working distance wins if the 
sample is clear enough..


At 08:31 PM 2/4/2008 -0500, you wrote:
>Search the CONFOCAL archive at 
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal 
>Hello all!
>
>I was wondering for which one penetration depth is higher: NA:1.2 
>60x lens or NA : 0.3 10x lens?
>
>thanks
>Sarah