LISTSERV - CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

September 2009

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Home
	CONFOCALMICROSCOPY September 2009

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Validating deconvolution
From:	sundar <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Mon, 21 Sep 2009 07:08:29 -0700
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (12 lines)

Hello all,

I'm using a deconvolution software to deconvolve a 3D stack. Does anyone
know of any way in which I can measure the improvement over the original
dataset? Are there any standard techniques for the same?

Thanks,
Sundar
-- 
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Validating-deconvolution-tp3685530p3685530.html
Sent from the Confocal Microscopy List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTS.UMN.EDU