CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

January 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Stanislav Vitha <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:02:22 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Dear confocalists,
do you have suggestions for a general counterstain that would fluoresce in 
green? 
I am doing 3D imaging of large number of pollen samples, and would like to 
increase the signal levels so that my acquisition times become more 
reasonable.

The pollen has been processed (cytoplasm removed), so I am trying to stain 
the shell (exine/intine) and am not interested in the cytoplasm.

Rhodamine B staining worked fine, but the emission is in red. I am after 
shorter wavelength signal for best resolution.

Thank you!


Stan Vitha 

ATOM RSS1 RSS2