CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

February 2013

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
George McNamara <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:45:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Uncompressed is the only way to go for reusability. OK to shrink to <10 
Mf for the stupid journal - and please feel free to quote me that a 10 
Mb limit is stupid, and send the original data to "The Cell - An Image 
library" (spnsored by ASCB) for access of full data.


On 2/27/2013 7:06 AM, Simon Walker wrote:
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Dear List,
> Can anyone recommend software for video compression (either free or
> licensed)?  We have some large files from live cell imaging exps that we need
> to submit to a journal and somehow get them down to less than 10 MB (this
> size limit seems crazy in this day and age, but maybe there are still people
> using dial-up to access journals..).  What codecs/file formats are people using
> to obtain the best compression with minimal loss of information?
> Thanks,
> Simon
>
>    

ATOM RSS1 RSS2