*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
The Sola from Lumencor is a great epifluor source from what I hear. Spectrum output is similar to that of typical metal halide systems like the x-cite, and you don't have to worry about modules or any of that stuff. It puts out continuous white light from 380-680nm, and lasts 15k hours.
Check it out here http://www.lumencor.com/products/sola_product_sheet.html
Hugh Newman
Graduate Researcher
Dept. Physics and Physical Oceanography
Memorial University
St. Johns, Newfoundland, Canada
> Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2012 02:07:47 -0800
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: LEDs
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Hi all,
>
> two years later, and a quite similar question.
>
> I use a Zeiss epifluorescence microscope, and I'm thinking to replace my HBO
> housing by a LED multicolor source.
> Of course, Zeiss sells the colibri setup, but the choice on the market is
> growing day after day, and for example, Thorlabs also sells something with 4
> colors and a control unit, with the Zeiss mounting system.
> I'm sure many other manufacturers do the same.
>
> Do anybody compared the HBO to a LED system for classical epifluorescence ?
> What should be the LED power to have something similar to a 100W at common
> wavelenghts (dapi, gfp, rhodamine, etc) ? Even after checking this page :
> http://www.olympusfluoview.com/theory/noncoherentsources.html
> It is still difficult to know which valeus and units should be considered...
>
> Thanks for the help
>
> J.
>
>
> -----
>
> Jacques FATTACCIOLI
>
> Département de Chimie
> Ecole Normale Supérieure
> 24 rue Lhomond 75231 Paris Cedex 05
> Email : [log in to unmask]
> Web : http://jacquesfattaccioli.wordpress.com
> --
> View this message in context: http://confocal-microscopy-list.588098.n2.nabble.com/LEDs-tp4283200p7307846.html
> Sent from the Confocal Microscopy List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
|