CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

December 1999

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Dec 1999 15:01:56 GMT0BST
Reply-To:
[log in to unmask]
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Subject:
CONFOCAL COMPARISON-CLARIFICATION
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-transfer-encoding:
7BIT
Organization:
School of Biomedical Sciences
From:
PHIL MUTCH <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
Dear All

This is just to say that my previous posting may have been
mis-leading. We have not seen the Biorad system. If I gave the
impression that we saw it and decided against it, I apologise. This
was not my intention. Hope this clears that up,

                        Barry Shaw
        (abusing Phil Mutch's subscription)
Mr Philip Mutch, BSc (Hons),
School of Biomedical Science,
E Floor Medical School,
University of Nottingham,
Nottingham,
NG7 2UH. UK.
E-mail [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2