CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2004

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kevin Braeckmans <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Nov 2004 10:22:43 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (90 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Dear Joost,

You said: "If I read you mail correctly you are doing Strip bleaching
experiments and then the difussion constant should be one dimensional when
using single photon excitation."

Just wanted to add: yes, but generally only for low NA lenses (uniform
cylindrical bleach), unless your sample is very thin of course.

Best regards,

Kevin

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Namens
Willemse, Joost
Verzonden: vrijdag 26 november 2004 9:09
Aan: [log in to unmask]
Onderwerp: Re: FRAP experiments


I think as already stated before in this discussion that as long as your
bleaching phase is short in comparison to the half time of recovery you
observe (e.g. < 5%) that the measurements can be quite good.
 
If I read you mail correctly you are doing Strip bleaching experiments and
then the difussion constant should be one dimensional when using single
photon excitation.
 
So the question is now what is your half time of diffusion in comparison to
the time interval. I am doing FRAP experiments myself on Histone 2B and then
multiple bleach itterations are usefull since they are always very short in
comparison to the half time of diffusion (0,5 s against 400s) But for
bleaching studies with for example free GFP you should use only one
itteration in principle.
 
In response to James Pawley, it is true damage can be caused but only when
using very high laser power with numerous itterations so as long as you can
prove your cells are still viable after the experiment do not worry about
that too much.
 
Joost willemse 
Dept. Molecular Biology
Wageningen University and Research Centre
Dreienlaan 3  
6703 HA Wageningen

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Narasimham Jammi 
        Sent: Thu 25-11-2004 23:00 
        To: [log in to unmask] 
        Cc: 
        Subject: Re: FRAP experiments
	
	

        Search the CONFOCAL archive at
        http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
	
        >
        > Next to this I have questions on Jammi and Kevin:
        > 1) what confocal do you use?
        > 2) do you know your switching time between bleaching- and recovery
phase?
        > 3) what FRAP model do you use?
        > 4) what parameters do you take into acount in your model?
        > And probably there will be many many more questions....
        >
	
	
        Hi Guido,
        1) I am right now performing my FRAP experiments on  a LEICA SP2
AOBS
        confocal
        2) I am doing my bleaching and recovery in the FLY mode...so it's a
        bidirectional scan..my time interval between scans is about 200
millisecs.
        3 and 4) As for the FRAP model, I have been using a 1 dimensional
lateral
        diffusion model (although I am not sure this is what i have/need to
use)
	
        -Jammi
        p.s thanks Kevin and the others for all your input..
        happy turkey day all!
	

ATOM RSS1 RSS2