CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2011

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Cammer, Michael" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 21 Jul 2011 10:54:37 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Just wanted to give an update.

We did extensive tests with Tetraspeck beads imaged by TIRF and the Nikon PFS with the 100X TIRF objective held the focus for hours under different temperature conditions.  There was lateral drift of up to 10 um when we turned the heat on and off to check for focus locking during temperature shifts, but the focus held.  We were very happy about this.

However, when we switched to cells on lipid substrates in the exact same chamber, the focus did not hold.

So we are somewhat mystified and continuing to run tests.

Regards,

Michael

From: Craig Brideau [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2011 12:34 AM
To: Cammer, Michael
Subject: Re: Olympus ZDC 2 vs. Nikon PFS

We have a Nikon PFS that mostly works.  We learned a few things early on that help make it more reliable.  It needs #1.5 cover slips.  If you use #1 it will overfocus as it is expecting #1.5 thick coverslips.  Dirt can be a big issue; the lens has to be fairly clean.  Sometimes dirt on the coverslip can throw things off as well.  Keeping the sample level is important, if there is any tilt it gets thrown off.  Finding the initial focus to get it to 'lock on' can require some patience occasionally.  You have to manually adjust the focus and keep trying to engage the PFS system.  It will eventually find the surface but it sometimes takes a few tries.  Usually it will get it on the first try though.  The performance is different for different objectives, so try all the PFS compatible objectives you have to see how they work.
I hope these tips help!

Craig


On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Cammer, Michael <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
If there is anyone out there who has had problems with the Nikon PFS system drifting out of focus during experiments or problems with multiple field focus fidelity, would you please contact me privately.  We are trying to assess how common this problem is and, more importantly, want to know any tips to counter these issues.

Thank you!

_________________________________________
Michael Cammer, Assistant Research Scientist
Skirball Institute of Biomolecular Medicine
Lab: (212) 263-3208  Cell: (914) 309-3270


</PRE>
<html>
<body>
------------------------------------------------------------<br />
This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain information that is proprietary, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by return email and delete the original message. Please note, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The organization accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.<br />
=================================
</body>
</html>
<PRE>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2