CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 1994

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Stephen C Kempf <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 28 Apr 1994 10:49:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Hey Billo,
 
I agree. I have certainly found vendors comments on this list useful. As
long as they're directed toward specific questions or criticisms I think
they should be allowed. Out and out advertisement of products should not
be tolerated; however, as I see it the VayTek message was in response to
a question that had been posed on the list and should be acceptable.
 
How do others feel?
 
Steve Kempf
 
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2