CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

June 2004

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Suzana Glavas <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Jun 2004 15:52:18 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Perhaps somebody can help me make sense of this.   We have a GFP tagged
protein expressed in C. elegans embryos.  Since the GFP signal is not very
strong, we use an anti-GFP antibody and a FITC tagged secondary to better
see this particular protein.  When we visualize the FITC stain, we see nice
membrane localized staining with very minimal background.  We then switch
over to DAPI to look at the nuclear staining.  When we switch back to FITC,
all of the nuclei can now be seen in the FITC channel.  We are visualizing
with an epifluorescence system prior to doing confocal.  Any ideas what
might be happening?

Suzana Glavas

ATOM RSS1 RSS2