CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

June 2015

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vladimir Ghukasyan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:55:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Dear Listers,

We are considering getting a light sheet setup for our core. I had a chance
to test briefly the Z.1 system from Zeiss and prepare to send some samples
to Germany to test the Ultramicroscope. Havy any of you worked with either
of these systems? I would be very thankful for any suggestion/comment
advice on this matter.

Our typical application is imaging of CLARITY cleared mouse brain samples.
High resolution may be very beneficial (imaging of axonal tracks) but not
absolutely necessary at this point. The Z.1 can work with a "CLARITY" long
working distance objectives, but the immersion media is limited to
non-organic solvents, so no BAAB/iDISCO, etc. Ultramicroscope as I have
learned today, can be used with any objective, but I wonder how is
chromatic aberration correction handled (hope to hear about that from the
company soon).

Thank you in advance,
Vladimir

ATOM RSS1 RSS2